|
1
|
- A Case Study on Development Incentives
- Jennifer Witt & Melinda Rowan
|
|
2
|
- Since Hynix announced its plans to build a factory in Eugene, the public
costs and benefits of their presence has been debated.
- With no official study on Hynix’s fiscal impact, it is difficult for
government organizations to judge the cost effectiveness of attracting
Hynix to the West Eugene enterprise zone.
- Furthermore, with few studies judging the impacts of development
incentives, such as those offered by the West Eugene enterprise zone, we
felt that this study could be used as a guide for those interesting in
analyzing the fiscal implications of future efforts to attract new
investment.
|
|
3
|
- Definition: any area designated by a city, county, or state, to be
exclusively cultivated for business development.
- West Eugene’s enterprise zone:
- Three year real and/or property tax exemption (company can apply for a
two year extension)
- Requirements:
- Company must reside in the boundary
- Be non-retail
- Increase employment by 10% each time it makes a new investment for
which it wants a real and/or personal property tax exemption.
- The West Eugene Enterprise Zone is currently closed to new businesses.
|
|
4
|
- We contacted the following organizations to obtain data for this study:
- Lane Council of Governments
- The City of Eugene planning department, land use and building permit
offices
- EWEB (Eugene Water and Electric Board)
- The Wetland Mitigation Bank
- The County Tax Assessors Office
- The Register-Guard
- Hynix
- Most information was obtained through interviews, as records searches
were too costly for this study.
|
|
5
|
- Estimates were constructed when primary data was either confidential or
incomplete.
- Estimated figures include:
- Changes in property and income taxes
- Percentage of income tax returning to Lane County
- Amount of wages Hynix pays that create a financial benefit.
- When estimating we used standard methods found in previous studies.
|
|
6
|
- When analyzing positive impacts of wages and the additional local
spending they generate, we used a what is called a “multiplier” effect.
- A multiplier specifies how many times local spending is re-spent through
a series of secondary transactions resulting from the initial income
(Here: initial income is wages paid by Hynix to local workers).
- Our multiplier comes from a well-known economic development model called
the IMPLAN (IMpact PLANning) model.
|
|
7
|
- Possible costs we examined:
- Taxes
- Roads
- Congestion
- Utilities
- Drought Potential
- Wetland Destruction
|
|
8
|
- Three kinds of taxes apply to Hynix:
- Property tax on the land : never qualified for an exemption.
- Property tax on buildings : exempted for 3 years. If Hynix builds
new structures on their
property, they can reapply for a tax exemption on that new structure,
assuming they have increased employment by 10% since their last
application.
- Personal Property tax on “non-rolling” stock (office supplies,
computers, forklifts, etc) : This includes items like production
equipment. The exemption follows the same rules as the real property
tax exemption. Hynix currently has an exemption of this kind.
- Hynix has, as of 2002, received 46 million dollars in tax exemptions.
|
|
9
|
- The City of Eugene made improvements to roads surrounding Hynix, costing
an estimated total of 3 million dollars.
- Light Installation.
- Turn Lane Installation.
- Other general road enhancements.
- Congestion: Roads around Hynix require no above average maintenance.
- Implies no bad congestion, although effects may be lagged.
- Would be difficult to isolate congestion effects from Hynix from other
sources, such as housing expansion in the area.
- Hynix paid a Systems Development Charge of $3.7 million to the city of
Eugene.
|
|
10
|
- Electricity
- Electric substation ($8.6 million, paid by Hynix).
- Independent energy contracts ensure Hynix won’t affect local consumer
rates.
- Water
- Expansion of water filtration plant was moved up by Hynix’s presence.
- No current capacity issues: no water rate changes for community.
- Probability of a three year drought is low.
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Process of compensating destroyed wetlands.
- Must create twice the acreage destroyed.
- $30,000/acre to restore.
- Hynix filled 10.4 acres.
- Restored or enhanced 25.59 acres.
- By fulfilling the law, effective cost for Hynix project is zero.
|
|
13
|
- Tax Breaks: 46 million
- City Road Enhancement: 3 million
- Congestion: uncalculated
- Electricity and Water Consumption: zero
- Drought Potential: uncalculated
- Wetland Destruction: zero
- Total Costs: 49 million
|
|
14
|
- Wages and benefits paid by Hynix.
- $51,998.89 is our estimate for average employee wages and benefits.
- Hynix averaged 644 employees, not including contractors.
- Annual Payroll: 644 employees * $51,998.89 = $33,487,285.16 per year.
- Five-year Payroll:
$33,487,285.16 * 5 years (from the beginning of 1997 to the end
of 2001) = $167,436,425.80.
- 1.52 is the multiplier for the semiconductor industry in Lane County.
- Five-Year Local Spending from Wages and Benefits: 1.52 * $167,436,425.80 = $254,503,367.20.
- Conclusion: Hynix has generated an estimated $254.5 million of spending
in Lane County as of the beginning of 2002.
|
|
15
|
- Tax revenue from Hynix and its employees.
- Hynix paid $5.2 million in property taxes as of 2002, and $510,616 to
the city, county, and schools.
- Additional tax revenue generated by employees.
- Five-year estimate: Employees paid at least $1,400,587.50 in income
taxes.
- Increased earnings leads to higher property taxes
- Five-year estimate: Employees paid between $1,933,988 and $4,080,391
in property taxes.
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Standard methodology assumes Hynix jobs are all additional jobs for the
community.
- Alternative conservative assumption:
No new net jobs in community, though Hynix pays about 33%
more. Only this additional 33%
should be considered positive impact.
- New numbers with conservative assumption:
- Higher wages and benefits with multiplier: $70.1 million.
- Additional tax revenue from employees income and property taxes: $0.4
million.
- Overall net impact: $39.5 million
- Note: Net impact still
positive!
|
|
18
|
- Range of net impact of Hynix on local community is clearly positive:
$39.5 million to $228.7 million
- Important missing factors:
- Property value changes.
- Congestion effects.
- Plant construction benefits.
- Employment of contractors on site.
- Overall: Such large estimated net positive impacts suggests that Hynix
has been beneficial to the local economy.
|
|
19
|
- Prof. Bruce Blonigen
- Prof. Bill Harbaugh
- Prof. Mark Thoma
- Prof. Tim Duy
- Mel Taylor and Steve West, EWEB
- Sherri Buri McDonald, Register Guard
- Chamber of Commerce
- Neil Bjorklund and Denny Braud from the City of Eugene Planning
Department
- Jerry Olsen, Hynix Semiconductor
- Denice Gray, Moss Adams
- Bruce Sorte, Oregon State University
- Milo Mecham, LCOG
|